On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, Dick Balaska wrote: > > Here is the zdnet response to the test: > >http://www.excite.com/computers_and_internet/tech_news/zdnet/?article=/news/19990415/2242246.inp While informative they did get one thing wrong: "For Linux, SMP is a new option, incorporated in the 2.2 release." -M@ -- Matthew Hixson - CIO "Noone's ever tried this before." FroZenWave Communications "That's why its going to work." http://www.frozenwave.com -- Trinity and Neo - Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/ To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) jlewis
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) Dick Balaska
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) jlewis
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: NT vs Linux info (fwd) Gavin M. Roy
- Fwd: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) Anatolii Belomestnov
- Re: Fwd: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: NT vs Linux info Rui Sousa
- Re: NT vs Linux info jakob
- Re: NT vs Linux info Dick Balaska
- Re: NT vs Linux info Matthew Hixson
- Re: NT vs Linux info Alan Cox
- Re: NT vs Linux info Robert G. Brown
- Re: NT vs Linux info Douglas W. St.Clair
- Re: NT vs Linux info Andy Poling
- Re: NT vs Linux info Alan Cox
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) Anatolii Belomestnov
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) Mark Hull-Richter
- Re: FW: NT vs Linux info (fwd) - a new angle Peter L. Phillips
