>>>>> "m" == mc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: m> The cards which I have used as a IP interconnect run as high as 1.0265 m> Gb/s. I do not have any latency figures though, there was no noticeable m> difference in latency. The question is really where it stands when compared with gigabit Ethernet and Myrinet. The latter can have extremely low latency (though to get that you don't run anything resembling IP over it) and serious cost per node. Of course, at the gigabit level everything has significant cost; the NICs are just the start of it. - J< - Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/ To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Fibre Channel adapter for linux? Netlink Linux admin
- Re: Fibre Channel adapter for linux? greg
- Re: Fibre Channel adapter for linux? davem
- Re: Fibre Channel adapter for linux? Matthew Jacob
- Re: Fibre Channel adapter for linux? Netlink Linux admin
- Re: Fibre Channel adapter for linux? Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Fibre Channel adapter for l... mc
- Re: Fibre Channel adapter f... Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Fibre Channel adapter for l... Will
- Re: Fibre Channel adapter f... Douglas Eadline
- Re: Fibre Channel adapt... Will
- Re: Fibre Channel adapt... Douglas Eadline
- Re: Fibre Channel adapt... Will
- Re: Fibre Channel adapter for linux? Jonathan Glass
- Re: Fibre Channel adapter for linux? Will
- Re: Fibre Channel adapter for linux? Don Holmgren
