This was discussed, but I didn't recall a firm decision.

I'll keep my eyes open for the patch that uses release().

Matt

On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:37:37PM -0800, Mike Anderson wrote:
> Matthew Dharm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Right... but I removed the release() function because that was marked (in
> > the documentation) as only for the old-style drivers.  So I'll need to
> > re-introduce it -- but it looks like all it has to do is free some memory.
> > Does that sound about right?
> 
> Yes it was previously removed, but IIRC this is the direction
> discussed on this thread. For a idle device the release functionality could
> be done in the context of the scsi_remove_host call, but for a busy
> device we need to have this call to clean up later.
> 
> -andmike
> --
> Michael Anderson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
> Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
> Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
> www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
> _______________________________________________
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

-- 
Matthew Dharm                              Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver

C:  They kicked your ass, didn't they?
S:  They were cheating!
                                        -- The Chief and Stef
User Friendly, 11/19/1997

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to