<flamefare> politics aside - bilingualism is good for your kids' future (nz is the exception to the internationalist rule - limiting) </flamefare>
Nick Rout wrote:
Jim has clearly stated the diversity & depth within list - a very, very good thing.you would need to change the name of the group to join up with gnu group.
We list GNU/Linux User Groups--that is, user groups that describe themselves
as "GNU/Linux" User Groups, and make an effort to distinguish the
GNU/Linux operating system from Linux, the kernel. We don't list "Linux
User Groups" in this page, but we invite them to become GNU/Linux User
Groups and help correct the widespread confusion about the system.
unless someone really feels a need to fragment the user community into
two groups?
Chris's thinking parallels mine - horses for courses. Anyone can forward group suggestions.
"GNU/Linux" is simply an honest declaration, & one that gives focus for those seeking forward motion for F/LOSS in general, around GNU/Linux distributions in particular.
I, for one, am happy exploring this simple focus, and would like to work with others in this aim.
Talk about it, if you want - or anything you like - at a social Wednesday night. That's the invitation.
Thanks CLUG, for making this possible (& Carl for explaining how).
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:24:59 +1200
InfoHelp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
read the original post
there was no proposal for changing CLUG's name or list discussion content
-- InfoHelp Services http://www.infohelp.co.nz/linux.html i686 2.4.20-8 RedHat Linux 9.0 - Gnome 2.2.0 - OpenOffice 1.0.2 - Mozilla Mail 1.2.1 [just SuSE firewall to setup & mail archive to transfer... new system]
