read the original post
there was no proposal for changing CLUG's name or list discussion content
Well, what I got from re-reading your original post was that you were, as "caller of the meeting", saying that one of the things to be covered in the meeting would be a discussion about potentially starting "a new group", which could charitably be seen as "renaming the existing group".
Anything else Linux users want to discuss as a group. E.g. if anyone is interested in formation & registration of a local GNU/Linux User Group, as specified in http://www.fsf.org/gnu/gnu-user-groups.html , I'd really like to hear from them. Add further points here ...
We've just taken the opportunity to talk about it here in the mailing list (which is called "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", incidentally, not "[EMAIL PROTECTED]")
I have no problem with the debate taking place, I just <imho> don't think it's a good-enough idea </imho>
-jim
