I've only had to fsck ext3 once that I can recall, and I've been using it more or less since it came out. For me it's been a very rare occurrence.
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 16:48, Net Llama! wrote: > On 12/03/02 16:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > SuSE, too (I see Aaron pointed this out, too). You might push ext3 harder > > than I do. I have nothing against XFS; it's a superior solution. I'm here > > at ext3, though, it ain't broken, so I don't feel the need to fix it. > > The sad thing is that i didn't push ext3 any harder than XFS. Ignoring > bugs & instabilities, ext3 still requires a stupid time-consuming fsck. > Yea, sure, the chances of losing data is significantly reduced, but > if i wanted to wait an hour for my terrabyte array to fix itself, i'd go > back to 1998. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
