-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Net Llama! spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: > The sad thing is that i didn't push ext3 any harder than XFS. Ignoring > bugs & instabilities, ext3 still requires a stupid time-consuming fsck.
ok... what bugs and instabilities specifically? stop w/ the generalities please. also, what fsck? why did you need one? I've never needed an fsck to fix an ext3 partition, and I've crashed plenty of them... - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org printk("What? oldfid != cii->c_fid. Call 911.\n"); 2.4.3 linux/fs/coda/cnode.c -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE97VTLSrrWWknCnMIRAkpaAKCRasjQwqZJ+RpqlmDgm2uzfWRfPwCgi0Cc f6xW8UKfCPzdAHScIdUNWUM= =ZGxo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
