On 12/03/02 16:59, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
Issues with ext3:Net Llama! spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:again, apples to oranges. reiserfs is a completely new codebase. it's easy for them to say "oops, here's why that broke. to fix it, we re-wrote everything." ext3 doesn't have that luxury. but, I still don't see you clarifying what "issues" you've had with ext3. it's run the mothership without issue since it was an alpha patch against the 2.2.x kernels.ReiserFS seems to have matured alot faster than ext3.
1) Really bad IO performance when compared to XFS. Ever tried to copy 6GB files on ext3 and then on XFS?
2) fscks that take longer than the .2 sec that XFS takes in recovery mode
Those are more than enough for my taste. I want my data, and i want it now.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com
6:00pm up 2 days, 3:28, 1 user, load average: 0.11, 0.14, 0.12
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
