> On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 04:48:42PM -0800, Net Llama! wrote: >> On 12/03/02 16:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Okay, now we're down to cases. ext3 is not immune to data loss, but it is > far less so than ext2. I don't have a terrabyte raid array to worry about, > so a "stupid time-consuming fsck" takes, oh, 10 minutes. Despite the
Is ext3 faster than ext2? I have a 36gig drive the when the "mount count exceded" time comes up it takes 15-20 minutes to check but it's ext2. > > Kurt -- Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] AKA Grunt <>< Registered Linux User #188143 Remove R777 to email _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
