On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 21:32:05 -0700
Andrew Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> > Hey, if you can't make a success with a product then use lawyers.  
> > 
> > 
> > dep wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>the article, btw, is from infoworld.
> >>
> > 
> > http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/redirect?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.infoworld.com%2Farticle%2F03%2F03%2F06%2FHNsco_1.html
> > 
> 
> And I thought they had reached the epitome of cranial-rectal interface 
> syndrome when still on the Caldera list. Question I have is why IBM's 
> AIX, and not HP-UX, Solaris, or any other Unix variant? Just that IBM 
> has the deepest pockets?

No. Project Montery was going to be mainly UnixWare and AIX. HP-UX would
probably not provide very much code. At least, I don't think SCO did much
with HP-UX. All their work was directed to AIX.

My Project Montery CD lists SCO, IBM, Sequent and Intel. I think Sun were
not a part of this.

-- 
+����������������������������+�������������������������������+
� Roger Oberholtzer          �   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]        �
� OPQ Systems AB             �      WWW: http://www.opq.se/  �
� Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43  �    Phone: Int + 46 8   314223 �
� 115 34 Stockholm           �   Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 �
� Sweden                     �      Fax: Int + 46 8   302602 �
+����������������������������+�������������������������������+
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to