I was referring to something else that moved large amounts of data at a time. telnet certainly doesn't, and lprng is kinda hard to measure in that respect. What about scp?
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Ben Duncan wrote: > Yup, telnet (Inside a NAT'ed LAN) and lprng all seem to work normally. > > Net Llama! wrote: > > And this behavior is only occuring with ftp, not with any other > > transp0olrt mechanism? > > > > On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Ben Duncan wrote: > > > >>Ok, I have SuSe 8.2 pretty much running ok on the laptop. This is > >>a -out-of-the-box SuSe 8.2 Professional. > >> Except: > >> > >>I have installed ProFtpd and I use inetd instead of xinet. > >> > >>ftp'ing TO the laptop and attempting to upload something like a 5K file takes > >>about 4 seconds on a 100MB ethernet network. A 300 MB directory takes OVER > >>4 hours. > >> > >>Conversely, I can ftp FROM the laptop to my Workstation/Server running SuSe > >>8.0 modified and the same file is instanous. The 300MB directory comes across > >>in less than a minute and 30 seconds. > >> > >>Any IDEAS on this one ? > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
