uh, http://www.remington.com
On Tuesday 18 September 2001 01:03, Chang wrote:
> you guys interseted me,. where is the full documentation for these?
> iinternal useonly? or you guys were playing with numbers? :)
>
> Ronnie Gauthier wrote:
> >I think that shortly we will be able to use rule .270 or .300 under the
> >personal choice option.
> >Also, I do believe that rule .50 should be seriously considered as a good
> >long range solution.
> >
> >On Monday 17 September 2001 21:07, dep wrote:
> >>On Monday 17 September 2001 21:07, Chang wrote:
> >>| Then find out why Ladden did it? Talk to him before making a
> >>| military arrest. :)
> >>
> >>as i understand it, our arrest of him will be under a provision of
> >>british military law, rule .303. we had a version of that, rule .308,
> >>but we wimped out and now are stuck with our own rule .223.
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
> ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
--
Ronnie
==================
Life can be a dream; or it can be a nightmare
it's all in your mind
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
