Both files (27&29) opened, but only showed a blank screen. I could open/close them repeatedly without reboot. I also noted timing differences for the reboot duration. But I think we'd have to check that later systematically if no freezing can be observed at all.
The Seven wrote: > I'll double check that later today, but it sounds interesting... > However, I expect the behavior to be generation dependent, so please > make sure that all files are checked on 2G at least. > > Sebastian, were you able to view the content of the notes 27 and 29? > What did you see? > > Sebastian Schutte schrieb: > >> Hi, >> >> I tested some files (25-35) on an Ipod nano 3rd gen. Except 27 and >> 29, they only led to repeated reboots. No freezing so far. For 27 and >> 29 there was no effect at all. >> >> Cheers, >> Sebastian >> >> >> Taylor Gordon wrote: >> >>> Update: I've tried note_0 and note_89 and they DONT work - so try the other >>> 126 for now :) >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:07 PM, The Seven <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> The first test note files are ready! >>>> Get them at http://taylor.fileave.com/lockup.zip >>>> >>>> There are 128 files named note_XXX.txt >>>> One of them will hopefully make the iPod lock up or show some other >>>> unexpected behavior. If we find that one, we're a huge step closer. >>>> >>>> It could also be that it just takes longer (or even shorter?) to >>>> reboot... So if one of the files shows a DIFFERENT behavior than the >>>> others, please tell me. >>>> >>>> Placing multiple of them on the iPod at once will NOT work! >>>> >>>> 3mpty schrieb: >>>> > 2009/2/17 The Seven <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> 3mpty schrieb: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Target address range is 0x22000000 to 0x2203fff (SRAM) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> The second number is 0x22003FFF or 0x2203FFF0? A digit is missing (am I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> wrong?) >>>>>> 0x2203FFFF, or rather a little below since our shellcode will have a nop >>>>>> zone of 2KB >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I'm trying right now some text file. >>>>> >>>>> 0x22 at the addresses where we need it (odd ones) will not hurt in >>>>> >>>>> >>>> unicode. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Oh, I forgot the endianess, stupid error, you are right >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Paolo >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev >>>>> http://www.linux4nano.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev >>>> http://www.linux4nano.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev >>> http://www.linux4nano.org >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux4nano-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev >> http://www.linux4nano.org >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux4nano-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > http://www.linux4nano.org > > _______________________________________________ Linux4nano-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev http://www.linux4nano.org
