Found this on the docs of 3G:
http://insidetronics.blogspot.com/2007/09/teardown-ipod-nano-3g.html
So it's a S5L8702 but I haven't found any documentation.


Am 19.02.2009, 09:37 Uhr, schrieb The Seven <[email protected]>:

> Yes, it can well be possible that the stack address of the data buffer
> varies. I hoped it didn't, however, it seems like I was either wrong
> there, or it has indeed an execution protection on the stack. That makes
> it a lot harder. However, the notes files were generated for 2G, not 3G,
> so it could be, that 3G uses different addresses at all. To confirm this
> and to generate the files for 3G, I need detailed docs of the processor.
>
> Sebastian Schutte schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I checked another 20 tonight (35-55). No freezing, but there are timing
>> differences. I then retried 27 and 29 to confirm that they did not show
>> any effect. This time, they led to normal reboots! I swear that I didn't
>> mess up on that one. Yesterday, they did not lead to reboots. But maybe
>> the problem is that it seems very hard to reproduce the crash behaviour:
>> The timing of the first crash, for example, always varies. When I try to
>> enter the notes folder, it takes something between and eye blink and a
>> second before the screen turns dark. Then I had the two files that did
>> not work yesterday, but today. What does that mean? Can the overflow
>> occur in a non-deterministic memory environment, leading to such
>> different effects? I hope this is helpful to anybody.
>>
>> The Seven wrote:
>>> If the 0x00s would have been a problem or the link qould not have been
>>> recognized, it would not have crashed.
>>>
>>> Taylor Gordon schrieb:
>>>
>>>> Hmmm... SO so far, it seems that none of the notes have made the ipod
>>>> freeze, right? I wonder why 27 and 29 didn't display anything at all  
>>>> though.
>>>>
>>>> @TheSeven: Maybe different opcodes with a '0' messed the file up? Or  
>>>> it
>>>> didn't think it was a valid link.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Sebastian Schutte
>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Both files (27&29) opened, but only showed a blank screen. I could
>>>>> open/close them repeatedly without reboot. I also noted timing
>>>>> differences for the reboot duration. But I think we'd have to check  
>>>>> that
>>>>> later systematically if no freezing can be observed at all.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The Seven wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll double check that later today, but it sounds interesting...
>>>>>> However, I expect the behavior to be generation dependent, so please
>>>>>> make sure that all files are checked on 2G at least.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sebastian, were you able to view the content of the notes 27 and 29?
>>>>>> What did you see?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sebastian Schutte schrieb:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I tested some files (25-35) on an Ipod nano 3rd gen.  Except  27  
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> 29,  they only led to repeated reboots. No freezing so far. For 27  
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> 29 there was no effect at all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Taylor Gordon wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Update: I've tried note_0 and note_89 and they DONT work - so try  
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> other
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 126 for now :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:07 PM, The Seven <[email protected]>  
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The first test note files are ready!
>>>>>>>>> Get them at http://taylor.fileave.com/lockup.zip
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There are 128 files named note_XXX.txt
>>>>>>>>> One of them will hopefully make the iPod lock up or show some  
>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>> unexpected behavior. If we find that one, we're a huge step  
>>>>>>>>> closer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It could also be that it just takes longer (or even shorter?) to
>>>>>>>>> reboot... So if one of the files shows a DIFFERENT behavior than  
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> others, please tell me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Placing multiple of them on the iPod at once will NOT work!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3mpty schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>  > 2009/2/17 The Seven <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 3mpty schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Target address range is 0x22000000 to 0x2203fff (SRAM)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The second number is 0x22003FFF or 0x2203FFF0? A digit is  
>>>>>>>>>>>> missing
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> (am I
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrong?)
>>>>>>>>>>> 0x2203FFFF, or rather a little below since our shellcode will  
>>>>>>>>>>> have a
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> nop
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> zone of 2KB
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying right now some text file.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 0x22 at the addresses where we need it (odd ones) will not hurt  
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> unicode.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh, I forgot the endianess, stupid error, you are right
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Paolo
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.linux4nano.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
>>>>>>>>> http://www.linux4nano.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
>>>>>>>> http://www.linux4nano.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
>>>>>>> http://www.linux4nano.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
>>>>>> http://www.linux4nano.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
>>>>> http://www.linux4nano.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
>>>> http://www.linux4nano.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
>>> http://www.linux4nano.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
>> http://www.linux4nano.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux4nano-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
> http://www.linux4nano.org



-- 
Erstellt mit Opera: http://www.opera.com



_______________________________________________
Linux4nano-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
http://www.linux4nano.org

Reply via email to