So, like, the other day Jon Smirl mumbled:
> Convert MPC i2c driver from a platform_driver to a
> of_platform_driver. Add the ability to dynamically load i2c drivers
> based on device tree names. Routine names were changed from fsl_ to
> mpc_ to make them match the file name. Common code moved to
> powerpc-common.* Orginal ppc driver left intact for deletion when ppc
> arch is removed.

This seems backwards to me.  I was under the impression
that our trend was _toward_ "Freescale" and "fsl" names...?
And aren't the drivers also already using "fsl-i2c" in the
DTS files as called out in the b-w-o.txt too?

Grumble long lines not hard-limited to 70-ish columns,
yes, even in log messages... :-)

jdl
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to