Jon Smirl wrote: > --- a/drivers/i2c/chips/tps65010.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/tps65010.c > @@ -571,6 +571,10 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id tps65010_id[] = { > { "tps65011", TPS65011 }, > { "tps65012", TPS65012 }, > { "tps65013", TPS65013 }, > + OF_ID("ti,tps65010", TPS65010) > + OF_ID("ti,tps65011", TPS65011) > + OF_ID("ti,tps65012", TPS65012) > + OF_ID("ri,tps65013", TPS65013) > { },
ti, ti, ti, ri? > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c > @@ -129,6 +129,12 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id ds1307_id[] = { > { "ds1339", ds_1339 }, > { "ds1340", ds_1340 }, > { "m41t00", m41t00 }, > + OF_ID("dallas,ds1307", ds_1307) > + OF_ID("dallas,ds1337", ds_1337) > + OF_ID("dallas,ds1338", ds_1338) > + OF_ID("dallas,ds1339", ds_1339) > + OF_ID("dallas,ds1340", ds_1340) > + OF_ID("stm,m41t00", m41t00) > {}, > }; The convention is to use the stock ticker, capitalized, if a company has one, I guess dallas is MXIM these days, but dallas is a good substitute based on the fact that most people still remember Dallas clock chips and so on from the Ancient Days. STMicroelectronics is STM. I couldn't care less about case sensitivity, but the stock ticker thing was always a good idea.. it gives a sort of grounding in reality for the manufacturer names. Are we still following this convention or are the names of devices simply arbitrarily defined by Linux kernel developers now? -- Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev