On 1/23/08, Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jon Smirl wrote: > > --- a/drivers/i2c/chips/tps65010.c > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/tps65010.c > > @@ -571,6 +571,10 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id tps65010_id[] = { > > { "tps65011", TPS65011 }, > > { "tps65012", TPS65012 }, > > { "tps65013", TPS65013 }, > > + OF_ID("ti,tps65010", TPS65010) > > + OF_ID("ti,tps65011", TPS65011) > > + OF_ID("ti,tps65012", TPS65012) > > + OF_ID("ri,tps65013", TPS65013) > > { }, > > ti, ti, ti, ri? > > > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c > > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c > > @@ -129,6 +129,12 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id ds1307_id[] = { > > { "ds1339", ds_1339 }, > > { "ds1340", ds_1340 }, > > { "m41t00", m41t00 }, > > + OF_ID("dallas,ds1307", ds_1307) > > + OF_ID("dallas,ds1337", ds_1337) > > + OF_ID("dallas,ds1338", ds_1338) > > + OF_ID("dallas,ds1339", ds_1339) > > + OF_ID("dallas,ds1340", ds_1340) > > + OF_ID("stm,m41t00", m41t00) > > {}, > > }; > > The convention is to use the stock ticker, capitalized, if a company > has one, I guess dallas is MXIM these days, but dallas is a good > substitute based on the fact that most people still remember Dallas > clock chips and so on from the Ancient Days. STMicroelectronics is STM. > I couldn't care less about case sensitivity, but the stock ticker > thing was always a good idea.. it gives a sort of grounding in reality > for the manufacturer names.
I'll put in whatever the Open Firmware police tell me to. We just all need to come to an agreement. > Are we still following this convention or are the names of devices > simply arbitrarily defined by Linux kernel developers now? > > -- > Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations > -- Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev