[snip]
> + [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 {
> + reg = <1 0x0 0x8000>;
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc837xmds-bcsr";
> + };
> +
> + [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 {
This isn't a problem with this device tree, but it's probably time we
started establishing some conventional generic names for nand flash
and board-control devices.
So, to start the ball rolling, I've seen several names for nand flash
nodes, I'd suggest we standardise on "nand-flash".
I've seen several variants for board control devices (cpld, bcsr,
fpga, etc.) I suggest we standardise on "board-control"
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
