On Mar 6, 2008, at 6:27 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> [snip]
>> + [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 {
>> + reg = <1 0x0 0x8000>;
>> + compatible = "fsl,mpc837xmds-bcsr";
>> + };
>> +
>> + [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 {
>
> This isn't a problem with this device tree, but it's probably time we
> started establishing some conventional generic names for nand flash
> and board-control devices.
>
> So, to start the ball rolling, I've seen several names for nand flash
> nodes, I'd suggest we standardise on "nand-flash".
This seems reasonable.
> I've seen several variants for board control devices (cpld, bcsr,
> fpga, etc.) I suggest we standardise on "board-control"
I don't see any reason for this. If I have a cpld or fpga why not
just call it that. I don't see what calling it 'board-control' gets
us. There may be non-board control functionality in an fpga than what
do we call it?
- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
