On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 04:39:30AM +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > This isn't a problem with this device tree, but it's probably time we
> > started establishing some conventional generic names for nand flash
> > and board-control devices.
> >
> > So, to start the ball rolling, I've seen several names for nand flash
> > nodes, I'd suggest we standardise on "nand-flash".
>
> What's wrong with the already well-established generic name "flash"?
I was concerned that using "flash" for both NOR flash (which it
already is) and NAND flash might be unwise. I am quite open to being
convinced otherwise, though.
> > I've seen several variants for board control devices (cpld, bcsr,
> > fpga, etc.) I suggest we standardise on "board-control"
>
> Fine with me, but it's very vague (hard to avoid though).
Yes.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
