Seems like this has been here forever, but I can't see why:
find_first_bit and find_next_bit both return >= NR_CPUS on failure.
From: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
lib/cpumask.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.28.orig/lib/cpumask.c
+++ linux-2.6.28/lib/cpumask.c
@@ -5,21 +5,20 @@
int __first_cpu(const cpumask_t *srcp)
{
- return min_t(int, NR_CPUS, find_first_bit(srcp->bits, NR_CPUS));
+ return find_first_bit(srcp->bits, NR_CPUS);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__first_cpu);
int __next_cpu(int n, const cpumask_t *srcp)
{
- return min_t(int, NR_CPUS, find_next_bit(srcp->bits, NR_CPUS, n+1));
+ return find_next_bit(srcp->bits, NR_CPUS, n+1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__next_cpu);
#if NR_CPUS > 64
int __next_cpu_nr(int n, const cpumask_t *srcp)
{
- return min_t(int, nr_cpu_ids,
- find_next_bit(srcp->bits, nr_cpu_ids, n+1));
+ return find_next_bit(srcp->bits, nr_cpu_ids, n+1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__next_cpu_nr);
#endif
--
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
