Hi Mike,

Just a first small thing:

On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:03:20 -0700 Mike Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1) The #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU seems unnecessary these days.
> 2) The loop can simply skip over offline cpus, rather than creating a tmp 
> mask.
> 3) set_mask is set to either a single cpu or all online cpus in a policy.
>    Since it's just used for set_cpus_allowed(), any offline cpus in a policy
>    don't matter, so we can just use cpumask_of_cpu() or the policy->cpus.
> 
> From: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The From: line should be the first nonempty line in the mail to get the
attribution correct.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgpFMcOVxrbvL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to