Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Just a first small thing: > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:03:20 -0700 Mike Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 1) The #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU seems unnecessary these days. >> 2) The loop can simply skip over offline cpus, rather than creating a tmp >> mask. >> 3) set_mask is set to either a single cpu or all online cpus in a policy. >> Since it's just used for set_cpus_allowed(), any offline cpus in a policy >> don't matter, so we can just use cpumask_of_cpu() or the policy->cpus. >> >> From: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The From: line should be the first nonempty line in the mail to get the > attribution correct. >
Ahh, ok, thanks! _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
