On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From 819ad3ed4660f4238e053728a8b5aa93d22b13d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:13:53 -0600 > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] irq: Maintain user set affinity > > This addresses a regression in that if a user specified an affinity > for an interrupt that affinity information would get reset between > a request_irq(), free_irq() and request_irq() for the same irq. > > On example of this is bringing up an ethernet interface, taking > it down and bringing it back up again. > > Instead of always using the irq_default_affinity we use the > previous setting of the IRQs affinity with the assumption that > at boot the IRQs affinity will be set to irq_default_affinity.
why ?, the default_affinity is expected behavior... for example: when MSI is used, second driver could get same irq if first driver is unloaded. YH _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
