On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:31:05 -0600 (CST) > Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >From 819ad3ed4660f4238e053728a8b5aa93d22b13d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:13:53 -0600 >> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] irq: Maintain user set affinity >> >> This addresses a regression in that if a user specified an affinity >> for an interrupt that affinity information would get reset between >> a request_irq(), free_irq() and request_irq() for the same irq. >> ... > > Are you able to identify when this regression occurred? It isn't > immediately obvious to me. > > If the regression is present in 2.6.27 or earlier, do you think we > should backport the fix? If so, a different patch would be needed due > to the presence of
it seems that is not a regression... YH _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev