On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 14:12 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From 819ad3ed4660f4238e053728a8b5aa93d22b13d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:13:53 -0600 > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] irq: Maintain user set affinity > > > > This addresses a regression in that if a user specified an affinity > > for an interrupt that affinity information would get reset between > > a request_irq(), free_irq() and request_irq() for the same irq. > > > > On example of this is bringing up an ethernet interface, taking > > it down and bringing it back up again. > > > > Instead of always using the irq_default_affinity we use the > > previous setting of the IRQs affinity with the assumption that > > at boot the IRQs affinity will be set to irq_default_affinity. > > why ?, the default_affinity is expected behavior... > > for example: when MSI is used, second driver could get same irq if > first driver is unloaded.
The default affinity should be set when the irq is allocated / assigned to a device, not when it's requested. Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev