David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:16:19AM -0500, Michael Barkowski wrote:
David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:18:28AM -0500, Michael Barkowski wrote:
ethernet0 (called FSL UEC0 in U-Boot) should be enet1 (UCC3/eth1), and
ethernet1 should be enet0 (UCC2/eth0), to be consistent with U-Boot so
that the interfaces do not swap addresses when control passes from
U-Boot to the kernel.
Um.. why is just swapping the aliases, rather than the enet labels the
right approach here?
Kim suggested it was better to localize the port ordering as a
property of the board rather than that of the QE, and I agreed.
And the enet0/enet1 names that appear in the labels come from the QE
documentation?
No.. but don't you think the UCC2, UCC3 names, which *do* come from the QE
documentation, should match their labels in numeric ordering?
Aren't the aliases just machine-specific shortcuts for the bootloader?
--
Michael
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
