On 07/28/2013 09:20:11 PM, Liu Po-B43644 wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 5:59 AM
> To: Liu Po-B43644
> Cc: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Fleming
Andy-
> AFLEMING; Hu Mingkai-B21284; Liu Po-B43644
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc/85xx: Add C293PCIE board
support
>
> On 07/25/2013 09:41:19 PM, Po Liu wrote:
> > + partition@1900000 {
> > + /* 7MB for User Area */
> > + reg = <0x01900000 0x00700000>;
> > + label = "NAND User area";
> > + };
> > +
> > + partition@2000000 {
> > + /* 96MB for Root File System */
> > + reg = <0x02000000 0x06000000>;
> > + label = "NAND Root File System";
> > + };
> > +
> > + partition@8000000 {
> > + /* 3968MB for Others */
> > + reg = <0x08000000 0xF8000000>;
> > + label = "NAND Others";
> > + };
>
> Again, what is the difference between "user area" and "others"?
I'm not
> even sure why it needs to be separate from "root file system", but
at
> least the root filesystem should be larger given the size of the
overall
> flash.
Do you mean just merge up four partition into one "RFS"? Or merge up
four partition into "RFS" and "User area" is better?
If you don't have a reason for separating them, then probably yes,
merge them all into one. If you do keep RFS and "user area" separate,
then "user area" should be the larger of the two, but the RFS should be
more than just 96 MiB.
> > + partition@580000 {
> > + /* 10.5MB for Compressed RFS
Image */
> > + reg = <0x00580000 0x00a80000>;
> > + label = "SPI Flash Compressed
RFSImage";
> > + };
>
> Space before "Image". Why specifiy that it's compressed, versus
some
> other filesystem type?
>
Remove all the "compressed" comments when express the RFS partition?
Yes.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
