On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 21:32 -0500, Liu Po-B43644 wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 11:47 PM
> > To: Liu Po-B43644
> > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org;
> > Fleming Andy-AFLEMING; Hu Mingkai-B21284
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/85xx: Add silicon device tree for
> > C293
> >
> > On 07/30/2013 09:13:28 PM, Liu Po-B43644 wrote:
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 2:28 AM
> > > > To: Liu Po-B43644
> > > > Cc: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Fleming
> > > Andy-
> > > > AFLEMING; Hu Mingkai-B21284; Liu Po-B43644
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/85xx: Add silicon device tree
> > > for
> > > > C293
> > > >
> > > > On 07/30/2013 03:49:22 AM, Po Liu wrote:
> > > > > + crypto@80000 {
> > > > > +/include/ "qoriq-sec6.0-0.dtsi"
> > > > > + };
> > > > > +
> > > > > + crypto@80000 {
> > > > > + reg = <0x80000 0x20000>;
> > > > > + ranges = <0x0 0x80000 0x20000>;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + jr@1000{
> > > > > + interrupts = <45 2 0 0>;
> > > > > + };
> > > > > + jr@2000{
> > > > > + interrupts = <57 2 0 0>;
> > > > > + };
> > > > > + };
> > > >
> > > > Do these inline the way the example shows.
> > > Sorry, Scott, I just remember in this way, the node can't be
> > > recognized by system when run Uboot. The include can't be in the
> > > crypto@80000. See the discussion in
> > > http://git.am.freescale.net:8181/#/c/736/ .
> > > Maybe I should re-modify the example file.
> >
> > git.am.freescale.net is not accessible outside of Freescale; don't
> > reference it on external lists. In any case, I don't know what
> > specifically you want me to look at there. Just put the explanation here.
> Sorry, I've realize that.
> The fact is that: when put the include into the crypto@xxxx, it can't compile
> success(make c293pcie.dtb as example). Error will show as:
>
> ERROR (duplicate_node_names): Duplicate node name
> /soc@fffe00000/crypto@80000/jr@1000
OK... It seems dtc will only merge duplicates when it's not the first
time it's seen the parent node. We're probably relying on a side-effect
of the intended behavior of accepting duplicates between the multiple
instances of the parent node.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
