> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cliff Spradlin [mailto:csprad...@google.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 1:52 PM
> To: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>
> Cc: andr...@mellanox.com; linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 0/4] RAW UDPv4 transport to support PTP
> on VLAN interfaces
> 
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 1:26 PM Keller, Jacob E
> <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com> wrote:
> > Does the use of the vlan interface prevent hardware timestamping? Or does it
> correctly infer the real interface capabilities?
> 
> Hardware timestamping works fine with VLAN interfaces. I'm using this
> capability in a production system. You can check if your kernel is
> propagating the PTP clock to the VPN interface correctly with "ethtool
> -T eth5.33".
> 
> There was a fluke in phc2sys's autocfg mode where it wasn't
> deduplicating multiple VLANs to a single clock, but that was fixed in
> https://github.com/richardcochran/linuxptp/commit/4c5d180ab343cac25dbc25c0
> 298b04cc48631d3a

Yep, then I see no reason for this series.

Thanks,
Jake
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel

Reply via email to