On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 7:45 AM Andriy Kohut <andr...@mellanox.com> wrote: > The new transport however is intended for a different configuration model - > VLAN > aware bridges with many interfaces and the VLAN devices on top of the bridge.
OK, thanks for elaborating. Let's see if I understand: the problem is that you would need to allocate a dedicated IP address for each connected interface for UDP-based PTP to work. Is that right? It looks like you've spent a lot of time implementing this. Could you talk about other possible solutions you considered, and why this one is the best? Could you use L2 PTP (ptp4l option "network_transport L2") instead so that you don't have to assign IP addresses? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
