On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:42:52PM +1000, mgrosve...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > I’ve been thinking about how include Linux PTP in a larger project that I’m > working on. > > To do so I could write a bunch of regex parsing magic to parse up the Linux > PTP output (and hope that I get it right for all the cases that matter). But > it got me thinking that probably maybe there’s broader problem to be solved > here.
What is the broader problem that you are trying to solve? > I’ve been wondering about adding a structured machine readable output option > to Linux PTP? Probably JSON formatted because of the ubiquitous nature of the > format(sigh). > > Is anyone working on this already? If not any major objections if I do? I'm no friend of json. The logging is meant for human eyes only. The "machine readable" output is the management interface. It provides a super-set of the logging information, but in binary format. I recommend using that instead of log scraping. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
