I don't know that I would classify 98 as being better than anything. Most OSes do the same exact things. The point is that 95/98 is way smaller and uses way less memory than anything after ME. You can run them on pretty meager hardware. I once installed 95 on an ancient notebook with no CD drive. 50 floppies :P Vista users, don't try that at home.
98 is more comparible to Damn Small Linux than it is to resource- hogging monsters like xp and vista. dos-man -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users Group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit our group at http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup
