Kent Crispin wrote: > > It is an egregious and fundamental error to think that these lists > and the USG represent the sum of ICANNs constituents. Who and how many will be members is a significant factor in the design of the voting mechanism, if not the organization. How many of us really care to participate? What do you think would be the total vote in ICANN's election in 2000 A.D. under the most aggressive voter registration senario (i.e. automatically registering all domain and IP address holders and allowing all others to self select).
- Re: Another view on Ogilvy and ICANN Esther Dyson
- Re: Another view on Ogilvy and ICANN Eric Weisberg
- Re: Another view on Ogilvy and ICANN Kent Crispin
- Re: Another view on Ogilvy and ICANN Eric Weisberg
- Re: Another view on Ogilvy and ICANN Bob Allisat
- Re: Another view on Ogilvy and ICANN Sean Garrett
- Re: Another view on Ogilvy and ICANN jeff Williams
- Re: Another view on Ogilvy and ICANN Ken Freed
- Re: Another view on Ogilvy and ICANN Einar Stefferud
- Re: Another view on Ogilvy and ICANN Dan Steinberg
- Re: Another view on Ogilvy and ICANN Einar Stefferud
- Re: Another view on Ogilvy and ICANN Jim Dixon
- Re: Another view on Ogilvy and ICANN Bob Allisat
- Re: Another view on Ogilvy and ICANN Esther Dyson