Eric Weisberg wrote:
> There is a basic flaw in this recipe. We are a small group
> dealing with discrete issues. There is no public opinion to
> manipulate nor anyreason to tailor your words to "woo" the masses.
> You are acting upon concrete issues your limited membership
> understands. No PR firm will be able to affect your relationship
> with your constituents nor with the USG.
Kent Crispin replied:
+ It is an egregious and fundamental error to think that these
+ lists and the USG represent the sum of ICANNs constituents.
I would not even include the USG in the constituency
of "NEWCO". Heck ICANN isn't even NEWCO, Kentie. In
fact the White Paper is rather incomplete, is in need
of a complete rewriting, a new set of Bylaws for a real
NEWCO. Only it will probably be a NEWNGO not some silly
non-corporation corporation.
Pray tell Mr. Crispin, who is the constituency of what
I call NEWNGO? I say it's every citizen and damn all the
interest groups and commercial cartels. And every citizen
can join this IFWP mailing list and assist in the formulation
of the new order. Kent, unfortuanely, is hung on these silly
Supporting organization ideas and the CORE maneuverings to
attain monopoly status. Doesn't mean we have to though.
Bob Allisat
Free Community Network _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://fcn.net _ http://fcn.net/allisat
http://robin.fcn.net
