Kent Crispin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 1999 at 02:44:19PM -0800, Greg Skinner wrote: >> 100,000 seems to be a popular figure [for a safe limit on the # of >> TLDs] > Not in my experience. People who really know about this stuff say > few thousand, usually, to maybe a few tens of thousands. OK, fair enough. Since the ballpark figure is on the order of tens of thousands, I was suggesting that above 100,000, you really do have to start worrying about performance problems. --gregbo
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Greg Skinner
- [IFWP] How many TLDs are safe? Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] How many TLDs are safe? Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] How many TLDs are safe? Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] How many TLDs are safe? Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Market Structure Failure David Schutt