jeff Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greg Skinner wrote: >> We might very well wind up with only a few large >> companies as registries, because the others just won't be able to >> survive financially. > Good point here, and a dam shame too really. But you are likely to > to end up being correct on this one if ICANN get's it's way with the > current "Accreditation Guidelines" in terms of licensing costs. Perhaps instead of accreditation, ICANN could establish a rating system for prospective registries, based on commonly understood and agreed-upon benchmarks. --gregbo
- [IFWP] How many TLDs are safe? Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] How many TLDs are safe? Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] How many TLDs are safe? Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] How many TLDs are safe? Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Market Structure Failure David Schutt
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Roeland M.J. Meyer