Dr. Lisse,
How are the DNSO.ORG measuring their "Consensus". What are the
proofs of "Consensus"? Does the DNSO.ORG have any bona fides?
IF so have the been posted to this list or any list for that matter?
Maybe they are on a web site? IF so which one and where?
The reason I ask these questions is that the claim that the INTA is supporting
DNSO.ORG is patently false, and we (INEGroup) have 84 members on INTA
that support our position. An that is just for starters. The ICC US branch in
Colorado inform me that there is no such stance on the par to the ICC
in support of the DNSO.ORG either.
Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> Roberto,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "A.M. Rutkowski" writes:
>
> > >So, in practice, should AFNIC go out of business tomorrow, who will decide
> > >who will pick up the business of .fr?
>
> You know that very well, whoever applies at IANA/ICANN with the most
> consensus of the "significantly interested parties". And that's how it
> should be.
>
> It is a service *TO* the community.
>
> el
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
