On Sat, Jan 16, 1999 at 10:28:47AM -0500, Antony Van Couvering wrote:
> Kent Crispin wrote,
>
> >
> > ccTLDs have a more interesting conundrum. They don't want to submit
> > to ICANN regulation. But on the other hand, they want ICANN to
> > endorse rfc1981 to give ccTLDs some protection against their
> > associated sovereignties. Of course, if I were ICANN I know how I
> > would handle this :-)
> >
>
> A lot of ccTLDs want to ICANN to endorse RFC 1591 because they want
> protection against ICANN. They want stability. They want continuity. They
> want to see some new standards before the old ones are thrown out. It's not
> as if ccTLDs are worried about the government "finding out" about them and
> showing them the door. They don't want a brand new principle of
> "sovereignty" to be invoked (and it *is* new) that would threaten the
> continuity of their operations.
You have said nothing that contradicts my above statement.
--
Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "Do good, and you'll be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
