On Fri, 16 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > When you consider that one of the primary purposes > > of this *interim* board was to establish an electorate, > > and hold formal elections to elect the first official > > *initial* board, your comments simply don't add up. > > The Commerce Department would seem to disagree with you. In its reply to > Bliley, at > > http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/blileyrsp.htm > > it says "the terms are used interchangeably": The Commerce Department can disagree with whomever they wish. I suggest you all actually look at the original document for yourselves.
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Joe Sims
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? sthaug
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Patrick Greenwell
- [Special attention Diane Cabell and/or Joe ... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose... Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on pur... Gene Marsh
