On Sat, Jul 17, 1999 at 03:55:44PM -0400, Gene Marsh wrote: > At 09:24 AM 7/17/99 -0400, you wrote: > My point is only that the elections were to be at the highest level of > priority, There are clearly other, higher, priorities. The White Paper, the Green Paper, the MoU with NTIA all quite clearly state that the stability of the Internet is the highest priority of all, etc. -- Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be [EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Patrick Greenwell
- [Special attention Diane Cabell and/or Joe Simms] t... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Kent Crispin
- ICANN, the MOU and priorities - St... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Ellen Rony
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Mark C. Langston
- [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community&quo... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Commu... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Commu... Gene Marsh
