On Sun, Jul 18, 1999 at 06:07:02AM +1200, Andy Gardner wrote:
> >OTOH, you railroaded David Crocker, Kevin Connolly, and I out of the
> >group, and there is a clear systematic anti-ICANN bias in the IDNO.
>
> ICANN - that's the supposed "open" organisation that is blocking the
> recognition of IDNO?
I know it is hard for you to realize this, but the world doesn't
revolve around IDNO. ICANN actually has a lot of other stuff to
worry about, and very limited resources with which to deal with
them.
[...]
> >OK. Good. I will be kent00001@hotmail -- kent99999@hotmail, all
> >generated by software, all having different passwords, all voting my
> >way.
> >
> >Password protection is amazingly naive.
>
> You haven't done your homework. Memebers are assigned a password by the
> system, not the other way around. You can set up as many e-mail address as
> you want, but you'd only have one that was issued a password.
Andy, thanks for making my point...
[...]
> >
> >I'll offer the same thing for lower cost, on my servers, and I will
> >throw in some security expertise as well. Sound fair?
>
> Go for it. You didn't understand how the password system works on the IDNO
> voting site
Gosh, I thought I did. I went to the site, and I didn't see anything
novel there. I understand how password systems in general work, and
I know their intrinsic limitations. Perhaps you could explain to me
how this one is different?
> so I don't hold up hope that you have the ability to put
> together anything better, or have the prerequisite expertise to do it.
>
> Stick to your day job.
Security is my day job.
--
Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
