On 17 July 1999, Dave Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >At 01:33 PM 7/17/99 , Mark C. Langston wrote: >>Would this be your day job with a company that was rife with Chinese >>spies? >> >>I wouldn't exactly trot that out as support for your abilities, Kent. > > >Nor, Mark, should you lay claim to any skills at logic. > >You live in San Jose, in California. There is a long list of offenses >committed in San Jose, in California, and in the United States. Clearly >the fact of your being a part of these environs makes you guilty of not >preventing those offenses. Very true, Mr. Crocker. But then, I don't run around claiming to be a cop here, either. Doesn't Kent have other perceived threats you should be helping him suppress somewhere?
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose Richard J. Sexton
- Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... William X. Walsh
- Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... Mark C. Langston
- Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... William X. Walsh
- Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... William X. Walsh
- Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... William X. Walsh
- Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on pu... A Gehring
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose A Gehring
- Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on pu... Richard J. Sexton
- RE: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose R . Gaetano
