Dave,
Should the USG reject the ICANN as NewCo, based solely on it's flawed
History.
Should your friend's reject you solely for your own flawed History.
Find me fifty, no just find even one entity w/o some flawed History, and
I will revisit your argument.
Arnold Gehring
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sunday, July 18, 1999 4:20 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>At 02:38 AM 7/18/99 , Joop Teernstra wrote:
>>At 07:32 PM 17/07/1999 -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
<snip>
>
>In any event my position, now, is that IDNO does not represent the
stated
>constituency and has much too flawed a history to justify its being
selected.
>
<snip>
>d/
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=
>Dave Crocker Tel: +1 408 246
8253
>Brandenburg Consulting Fax: +1 408 273
6464
>675 Spruce Drive
<http://www.brandenburg.com>
>Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>-
>This message was sent via the IDNO-DISCUSS mailing list. To
unsubscribe,
>send a message containing the line "unsubscribe idno-discuss" to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information, see http://www.idno.org/
>
