Sunday, July 18, 1999, 8:54:33 AM, Dave Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In any event my position, now, is that IDNO does not represent the stated > constituency and has much too flawed a history to justify its being selected. In other words, since the INDO will not explicitly support the CORE agenda, it should not be recognized. -- William X. Walsh General Manager, DSo Internet Services Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934 The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go crying to every time you have something to whimper about.
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose Richard J. Sexton
- Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose Mark C. Langston
- Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... William X. Walsh
- Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... William X. Walsh
- Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... William X. Walsh
- Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on pu... A Gehring
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose A Gehring
- Re: Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on pu... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on pu... Richard J. Sexton
- RE: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose R . Gaetano