> I actually meant to include the poised list as an example of a place
> where I have seen a good amount of support for ICANN as well.
Actually if you read the Poised list (I am a former co-chairman of the
IETF Poised working group) you will find that the IETF support for ICANN
is not at all clear or unqualified.
And one has to remember, that until ICANN amended its by-laws to eliminate
the parity role of individuals in SO's, the PSO design offered by the IETF
would have had to be rejected because it has absolutely no role for
individuals, or indeed for anything but large standards making bodies.
--karl--
- Re[2]: ... Ellen Rony
- Re: Re[... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IF... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IF... Mikki Barry
- Re: [IF... Gordon Cook
- Re: [IF... Mikki Barry
- Re: [IF... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IF... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] ... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IF... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IF... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IF... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IF... Karl Auerbach
- [IFWP] ICANN's &... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Eric Weisberg
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpo... Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
- RE: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? R . Gaetano
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose? Greg Skinner
