A land-rush pursuant to previously-existing rights. So it's first come first serve, unless it isn't. At 10:34 AM 8/12/99 -0400, you wrote: >>I suppose under the universal principle of justice you set forth below that >>if you didn't lock your house and somebody came in and stole your stuff, >>that you wouldn't consider it theft because, hey, you weren't prudent. > >Bad analogy. Your house is, by definition, yours. A character string >belongs to no one. This is more like a land rush. First come, first >served if you are prudent enough to take advantage of the opportunity >pursuant to previously existing rights as clearly and specifically defined. > > > > > @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain Name stor... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain Name... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain ... Dan Steinberg
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain ... Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain ... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain ... Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain Name... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain ... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain ... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain ... Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain ... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain ... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain ... Karl Auerbach
- Re[2]: [IFWP] Political Doma... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain Name story Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain Name story Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain Name story Jeff Williams
- RE: [IFWP] Political Domain Name story R . Gaetano
- RE: [IFWP] Political Domain Name story Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain Name story Dan Steinberg
- Re: [IFWP] Political Domain Name story Michael Froomkin