A land-rush pursuant to previously-existing rights.  So it's first come
first serve, unless it isn't.  



At 10:34 AM 8/12/99 -0400, you wrote:
>>I suppose under the universal principle of justice you set forth below that
>>if you didn't lock your house and somebody came in and stole your stuff,
>>that you wouldn't consider it theft because, hey, you weren't prudent.
>
>Bad analogy.  Your house is, by definition, yours.  A character string
>belongs to no one.  This is more like a land rush.  First come, first
>served if you are prudent enough to take advantage of the opportunity
>pursuant to previously existing rights as clearly and specifically defined.
>
>
>
>
>

@ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Reply via email to