[REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was "archive" ) Re:(8)

[Al . Bri]

Ted wrote:
> I mean if someone on the development team were given responsibility for
the HTML, and wanted to use their visual editor of choice, would that be OK?
Of course, if any custom server-side CGI were required (say a PUT handler),
then of course REBOL would be have to be used for that. After all,
integrating REBOL with other (non-scripting) products is also an important
area.

Me! Me! Me! Me!

I'll just use my REBOL HTML dialect and R2HTML.

Andrew Martin
Awake!
ICQ: 26227169
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
-><-