On 2/6/07, Ben Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For whatever another 2c is worth in this thread.... ;)
Actually, Ben, that's the 2c that convinced me that <hr />s do have a raison d'etre. The tag truly is unfortunately named, though. Dan ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
