On 06/29/2014 11:00 PM, Raine M. Ekman wrote:
> Quoting Vesa <[email protected]>:
>
>> Your only options are ALSA or Jack. However, Jack support on LMMS can be
>> a bit glitchy. So your best bet is ALSA, and closing down LMMS whenever
>> you need sound somewhere else.
> If you don't need to do any MIDI communication in or out of LMMS, I'd  
> suggest ALSA out to the "default" device from LMMS and then in to PA.  
> It has a bit of latency, but it doesn't matter that much if you're  
> only sequencing things. That's been the path of least resistance on my  
> system, and fairly bulletproof.
>

That may work, but maybe not for everyone... PA tends to give problems
for some, I guess it's dependent on hardware or system configurations.

IMO we need someone to solve why our Jack backend gives so many xruns...
or is it just me?



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to